Skip to main content

How it works

One connected workflow for your association

Set up the community once, keep ownership records current, manage requests and architectural reviews, monitor governing compliance, and keep every board decision and follow-up organized in one accountable system.

The workflow, step by step

Three stages, six steps — with a person in control at every one.

  1. Set up

    Association, buildings, owners & governing rules

    Steps 1–3

  2. Operate

    Requests, reviews, concerns & compliance

    Step 4

  3. Decide & track

    Board action, history & follow-up

    Steps 5–6

  1. Set up your association

    Add the association, its buildings, and the people responsible for managing it.

    Create the association workspace, add its buildings, and establish the board and management structure so every later workflow is tied to the correct community.

    Set it up once
  2. Build the owner & unit register

    Bring ownership records into one working register.

    Association Radar gathers available public unit and ownership records, preserves source and verification status, and flags missing or conflicting information for human review.

    Review exceptions, not spreadsheets
  3. Organize governing rules & responsibilities

    Give every review the right governing context.

    Record the rules and procedures that matter to your community, including rental restrictions, architectural requirements, association procedures, and other governing obligations.

    One reference point
  4. Capture what needs attention

    Bring community activity into one controlled workflow.

    Community Requests, architectural applications, ownership changes, owner concerns, and possible governing-compliance activity all enter the same accountable system instead of living in separate emails, spreadsheets, and text threads.

    One place to start
  5. Review, assign & decide

    Turn scattered information into clear board and management action.

    Review sources and documents, request more information, assign responsibility, document decisions, and keep anything that still needs attention visible until it is resolved.

    Human review stays in control
  6. Keep one accountable record

    Preserve the history of what happened and what happens next.

    Keep ownership changes, community requests, architectural reviews, governing-compliance concerns, decisions, documents, and follow-up organized in one board-ready record over time.

    History that stays organized

Association Radar organizes the information. The board, management, and counsel confirm the rules, review the evidence, and decide what happens next.

Intake

Many ways community activity enters the system

Owners, residents, board members, management, public records, architectural submissions, and approved public-source research can all surface information that needs attention. Association Radar brings that information into the appropriate workflow for review and follow-up.

People & community input

Owners and residents raise concerns, submit architectural applications, and follow their requests through to a decision. Management and board members add what they observe. Every submission keeps its attachments and its review history.

  • Community Requests
  • Owner and resident concerns
  • Management observations
  • Architectural submissions

A submission is information for review — not verified evidence, not a violation, not a fine, and not an enforcement decision. The association controls whether anonymous submissions are allowed, and every submission requires human review.

Records & public-source information

Ownership records, governing documents, and approved public-source research are organized beside what the community submits. Every item keeps its source, capture date, and confidence level.

  • Ownership changes
  • Public records
  • Approved public-source rental and compliance research
  • Documents and supporting evidence

Signed-in association members only. Public information requires human verification, and automated cross-platform discovery is not enabled by default.

The confidence model

Confidence levels describe the strength of public evidence and matching — they are never a legal conclusion.

Public data can be incomplete or out of date, so human verification is always required before any enforcement step.

High Confidence

Strong public evidence with a clear unit match — for example, a public review describing a stay length together with an unambiguous unit identifier. Still requires board/management review.

Medium Confidence

Meaningful public evidence with a probable unit match. Recommend management verification before any next step.

Lead Only

A starting point worth checking — never presented alongside stronger evidence and never treated as ready for enforcement.

No status implies a confirmed violation without a person's explicit confirmation.

Give your board and management a clearer way to care for your community.

Organize rental compliance, community requests, ownership information, and board-ready records in one place — with people in control of every decision.